By now, what I have done for Capture-HPC is:
This is to help dubugging and coding the Capture client. According to the message format defined in ealier Capture, the mock server will send an command to client firstly and then keep listening to client's log.
After the server's working, we can start the Capture Client. The command is same as the earlier beta, although I updated the client code, which changes the way that invoke an IE process.
Why I change the IE's invocation? Because I need to add my sniffer into the starting process. The sniffer is a dll file, written in C++ language. This will be more convenient to code, debug. Moreover, user can take the COM emulator as an optional choice. Along with the sniffer is emulator and emulation list. I would like to introduce the policy of emulation. The COM controls can be defined into four strategies:
Calling the CoGetClassObject method, if it not FAILED, this component has been restistered correctlly into the operating system. In our sniffer, all the creation of controls can be recorded as an event.
Here I have a file to list all the controls and responding methods that to be emulated. This list will be loaded into memory as the initialzation for sniffer.
The list is based on some known vulnerabilities, and we can obtain them by CVE etc..
These are controls existing but no attacking reported by now. We only emulate the creating function.
This strategy is for the detection of those cunning attack. Some of the malicious script will create a non-existed control to judge if the target is an actual program or not.
The emulator is a COM component written in python. Before using it, one need be registered into windows. all the method in this component is progid+methodname, to ensure the unique calling.
The sniffer is charging of mechanism while the emulation list and emulator is charging of policy. This can be easy to maintain since the seperation of policy and mechanism.
In the next weeks, I will begin to fix some bugs in sniffer. Here are the problems: